Re: [Evolution-hackers] EDS ABI changes in 2.24?!

[Srinivasa Ragavan <sragavan novell com>]

On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 10:57 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:

> Can such ABI changes please be discussed on this list? I'm interested to
> hear about them beforehand and won't notice them if they are only
> discussed on IRC or in a bug tracker entry; there may be others in the
> same position. Thanks!
> 
Sure. I would make sure that such things come up on the list here-on.
Infact I'm doing it for Camel for 2.24.

> In 2006 Michael Meeks wrote on this list that "I -thought- we had some
> agreement written in blood that the e-d-s ABI was now frozen." and in
> the camel Bugzilla entry #543389 Srinivasa again confirmed that "we
> support libebook/libecal as supported APIs". Does that include
> libedataserver?
> 

> That library is necessary when handling more than just the default data
> sources because it provides the e_source_* calls. Therefore I consider
> it part of the libebook/libecal API - agreed?
> 
> 

I think I agree to that. Just that it wasn't explicit. 

-Srini.