Re: [Evolution-hackers] Content-Disposition for images in the signature

[Srinivasa Ragavan <sragavan novell com>]

Sorry for the noise, I just saw the bug created by you. Just clearing my
mails in a jetlag. 

-Srini.

On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:22 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> I think, it qualifies to be a bug in bugzilla. (donno if one is there
> already)
> 
> -Srini.
> 
> On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 14:38 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > 
> > When you add an image to your HTML signature, it'll make the
> > content-disposition "attachment" and it'll set the filename header.
> > 
> > Both actions are incorrect: the content-disposition is inline and
> > there's no need to set the filename header. Both will make E-mail
> > clients like Outlook, but also Evolution itself, think that the E-mail
> > contains an attachment (a file attachment).
> > 
> > I have seen Evolution do this wrong for all kinds of inline embedded
> > images, whenever you insert this into your HTML document. This is
> > incorrect behaviour and not conform MIME.
> > 
> > ps. For a free software E-mail client, I think the better option is to
> > go with the specifications. That Outlook gets things wrong is not a good
> > excuse. Although I think modern E-mail clients like Outlook are getting
> > this right nowadays.
> > 
> >