On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 08:57 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> Ross,
>
> > In the case of getChanges(), this is a local operation so just needs to
> > be fixed. It shouldn't take more than the timeout, even with 10k
> > contacts.
> >
> 10K? I have seen multiple enterprise users books with 100K contacts. I
> remember some bug where the user had close to a million contacts :(,
> that might be GAL or GW System addressbook.
But do the GW or GAL backends implement getChanges()? With that call
the number of changes is fairly unrelated to the number of contacts, so
it should always be fast enough.
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: ross burtonini com
jabber: ross burtonini com
www: http://burtonini.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part