Re: [Evolution-hackers] Let the porting begin

[Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj novell com>]

I took a look at the IDLE implementation last night and felt it went
about it the wrong way.

Firstly, the added camel_stream_[read,write]_nb() and
camel_stream_read_idle() functionality is totally unnecessary and just
makes the camel stream API gross (not to mention duplicating a lot of
code as there's no real difference from the normal read/write
implementations other than the timeout).

You should simply poll() on the socket descriptors (and a pipe fd used
for telling the IDLE thread's I/O loop to finish and send DONE).

Jeff

On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 00:41 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 14:15 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > Hi there,
> 
> > Using this changeset you can follow the changes to camel-lite:
> > 
> > 	http://tinymail.org/trac/tinymail/changeset/2823
> > 
> 
> This changeset are a bunch of compilation warnings for Matthew's Base64
> patch to Camel: http://tinymail.org/trac/tinymail/changeset/2827
> 
> 
> ps. Adding Matthew in CC.
>