Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions
- From: "Øystein Gisnås" <oystein gisnas net>
- To: "Ross Boylan" <ross biostat ucsf edu>
- Cc: evolution-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Introduction and Questions
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 23:20:54 +0200
2007/5/31, Matthew Barnes <mbarnes redhat com>:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> What version to start with? I'm on Debian GNU/Linux, which currently has evo
> 2.6. I notice that's a bit dated (although I did see that a few months ago
> some of the Debian packagers were interested in making a more recent
> version). I've been working from the Debian version. Does that version, the
> last stable release (from evo, not Debian), or svn head make the most sense
> to work from? (BTW, the one bug I fixed was one that was already fixed
> post-2.6).
FYI, Debian Unstable has Evolution 2.10. Might be easier to grab at
least the 2.10 dependencies from there. You'll need to upgrade gtkhtml
and likely also your GTK+ library stack to get 2.10 to build.
In case you're on a Debian-based distribution and not pulling from
svn, I would recommend using pre-built packages, or even building the
packages yourself. 2.10.2 is in the archive, and I will do 2.11.2 this
weekend.
For my own development setup I use the 2.10.x packages plus custom
build from svn for the module I'm hacking on. e-d-s for example, I
install to /opt/evolution-data-server. Then I can start development
e-d-s with 'LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/evolution-data-server/lib
/opt/evolution-data-server/libexec/evolution-data-server-1.12' and can
also start the stable e-d-s with
'/usr/lib/evolution/evolution-data-server-1.10'
Cheers,
Øystein
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]