Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase
- From: Daniel Gryniewicz <dang gentoo org>
- To: Srinivasa Ragavan <sragavan novell com>
- Cc: evolution-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:01:11 -0400
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 15:00 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:19 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 �8:59 +0000, Srinivasa Ragavan a �it :
> > > On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:36 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > > > I've seen that too, but the point was more: "Why are the message view
> > > > headers looking different than every other ETable I can see in
> > > > evolution ?". I've looked at different themes and it was always
> > > > different. I'm not an expert in GtkWidget hacking but can't we "inherit"
> > > > some properties from regular list headers ?
> > >
> > > Different in what sense? I see that message-list is not consistent with
> > > GtkTreeview but so as is the other memo/task list. Im sorry, I'm not
> > > getting it.
> > See attachements:
> > - in mail view, even if it's not perfect it looks like a GtkTreeView
> > header
> > - in memo view, the header looks like a button
> > This is even more flagrant with the Glossy theme.
> Frankly, for me with Industrial, it looks the same in both places.
For me, it looks like Gilles. I have a clearlooks-based theme. I'd
guess it's engine related?
] [Thread Prev