Re: [Evolution-hackers] Missing svn tags for e-d-s / evolution 2.18 releases

[Frederic Crozat <fcrozat mandriva com>]

Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 20:21 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit :
> Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 18:03 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
> > Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 19:24 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit :
> > > Le lundi 21 mai 2007 à 17:19 +0200, Frederic Crozat a écrit :
> > > > Hi Evolution / E-D-S maintainers,
> > > > 
> > > > it appears that since CVS to SVN migration, no evolution / e-d-s release
> > > > was followed by a SVN tag creation in <module_name>/tags.
> > > > 
> > > > These tags are very useful for you, maintainers but also for
> > > > contributors and vendors when they try to search for changes between
> > > > releases.
> > > > 
> > > > Could you try to create those missing tags and make sure they are
> > > > created when releasing new tarballs in the future (I guess somebody
> > > > script was not migrated correctly to SVN ;) ?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks you in advance.
> > > 
> > > in fact it seems evolution uses branches over tags
> > > 
> > > evolution stable branch can be found at :
> > >  http://svn.gnome.org/svn/evolution/branches/gnome-2-18
> > 
> > Branches and tags are different beast :
> > -branches are used to do developement for a particular release of GNOME
> > (here 2.18.x series)
> > -tags are pointing each release (ie tarball generation), regardless of
> > branches.
> > 
> sorry I was unclear. I meant that afaics, evolution never tagged
> releases, or something definitely got lost in the cvs->svn transition.

They did, check :
svn ls http://svn.gnome.org/svn/evolution/tags/ | grep EVOL 

-- 
Frederic Crozat <fcrozat mandriva com>
Mandriva