Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution's UI, consistency and codebase



Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 11:01 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz a écrit :
> On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 15:00 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:19 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > > Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 08:59 +0000, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
> > > > On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:36 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > > > > I've seen that too, but the point was more: "Why are the message view
> > > > > headers looking different than every other ETable I can see in
> > > > > evolution ?". I've looked at different themes and it was always
> > > > > different. I'm not an expert in GtkWidget hacking but can't we "inherit"
> > > > > some properties from regular list headers ?
> > > > 
> > > > Different in what sense? I see that message-list is not consistent with
> > > > GtkTreeview but so as is the other memo/task list. Im sorry, I'm not
> > > > getting it.
> > > 
> > > See attachements: 
> > >  - in mail view, even if it's not perfect it looks like a GtkTreeView
> > > header
> > >  - in memo view, the header looks like a button
> > > 
> > > This is even more flagrant with the Glossy theme.
> > 
> > Frankly, for me with Industrial, it looks the same in both places.
> 
> For me, it looks like Gilles.  I have a clearlooks-based theme.  I'd
> guess it's engine related?
> 
> Daniel
> 
indeed, for reference (and non pgo readers):
http://abock.org/2007/07/02/suboptimal-theming-in-gtk/
http://blogs.gnome.org/thos/2007/07/04/re-suboptimal-theming-in-gtk/

long story short, ETree needs special handling of the gtk-engine to be
drawn in a way that makes it look like a GtkTreeView and even then, it
is very possible it won't be perfect.
-- 
Gilles Dartiguelongue <dartigug esiee fr>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]