Am Mittwoch, den 12.12.2007, 13:58 -0500 schrieb Matthew Barnes: > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 23:21 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > > Frame files are the master copies here. the master copy should be in svn, in a format that i can open && edit. having it in on someone's personal computer in some company is not my understanding of community software. > > You think committing Frame files to svn would solve it? If so, I would > > be happy to do that. if novell buys a framemaker copy for every contributor who wants to edit the evolution user docs, i can live with that workaround. ;-) seriously: it won't solve your problem that any changes have to be manually "backported" from the svn version to novell's file, and i guess that could become a lot of work. > > I'm open to propose a new tool to the doc team here for Evolution if > > any. Definitely hand editing the entire doc file isn't going to be > > easy. > Agreed. I'm a bit out of my element here. Maybe Andre can chime in > with some suggestions. What tools does the GNOME documentation team > use? Surely we're beyond hand-editing XML files (/me hopes). > > Here's a few possibilities, but I don't much about them: > http://wiki.docbook.org/topic/DocBookAuthoringTools i'm also not a doc writer, i only know of emacs users, and that's most likely not an option here. i've already asked for feedback on the gnome-doc-list, but srini may of course also blog about it (we're so web2.0y, aren't we?), explaining the issue and asking doc writers for feedback...? andre -- mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed http://www.iomc.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil