On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 11:43 +0000, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > On må, 2006-05-08 at 11:46 +0100, Pejvan BEIGUI wrote: > > > I have been following the Evolution mailing list for a while now, but > > I can't seem to find any information about the Windows port, > > mentionned here: > > http://go-evolution.org/Evo2.6#W32.2Fx64_porting even though the > > 2.6 has now been released. > > It's a wiki, you are free to add stuff there if you intend to help with > a port to 64-bit Windows, if that is what the rather cryptic mention on > that page means... I personally don't have any plans to port Evolution > to 64-bit Windows. (Well, actually, building *Evolution* for 64-bit > Windows would presumably not be a big deal at all, once all the > dependencies are in place. Hint: none of them, not even a suitable > compiler, are.) Now, what would be neat would be a port to .NET 2.0 Managed C, especially if it could be done without architecture dependencies. Then one build would work on x86, x86_64, IA64, etc. I, however, am not volunteering. -- Zan Lynx <zlynx acm org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part