Re: [Evolution-hackers] no-inst headers camel-private.h?

[Smartuser <smartuser gmail com>]

camel/providers like for example: groupwise uses CAMEL_SERVICE_LOCK which is 
declared in the camel-private.h file. So it doesn't seem private to me.

On Wednesday 19 July 2006 15:00, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 14:36 +0200, Smartuser wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've some question about the camel-private.h
> > Why is it a no-inst header according to the Makefile.am?
> > As far as i know almost every provider depends on it.
> > Is there a reason or is it just a mistake?
> >
> > Serjan Pruis
>
> As the name suggests, I am led to believe that it is a private header
> and intentionally not installable.
> The mistake could actually be that the providers include this directly.
>
> Harish