Re: [Evolution-hackers] no-inst headers camel-private.h?

[Harish Krishnaswamy <kharish novell com>]

On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 14:36 +0200, Smartuser wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've some question about the camel-private.h
> Why is it a no-inst header according to the Makefile.am?
> As far as i know almost every provider depends on it.
> Is there a reason or is it just a mistake?
> 
> Serjan Pruis

As the name suggests, I am led to believe that it is a private header
and intentionally not installable.
The mistake could actually be that the providers include this directly.

Harish