Re: [Evolution] Re: [Evolution-hackers] Questions about evolutionfuture plan

[Lee Revell <rlrevell joe-job com>]

On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 20:32 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 14:10 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> 
> > For example, I posted a patch which speeds up the display of the "Unread
> > Mail" folder by _several orders of magnitude_, but it won't be merged
> > anytime soon because it disables hiding of junk messages (which IMHO was
> > so inefficiently implemented that it should never have been allowed in,
> > but now that we have the "feature" we can't just rip it out, even for a
> > 100x speedup in displaying the message list).  See the "Performance with
> > Exchange 2003" thread, among others.
> 
> 
> Then why don't you replace the "feature" with a better implementation
> and add it to that patch of yours?

I am working on a mergeable version of the patch, but don't have as much
time as I would like.

Lee