Re: [Evolution-hackers] Patch Review process
- From: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj novell com>
- To: Harish Krishnaswamy <kharish novell com>
- Cc: evolution-hackers lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Patch Review process
- Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 12:41:25 -0400
patches being sent to the list (if people set the "show inline" flag)
alow us to comment on individual portions of the patches which is more
effort to do if we have to view the patch on a web page and having
bugzilla mails redirected to e-p@ won't solve that.
Jeff
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 20:05 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> hi All,
>
> During the irc meeting last week, we discussed the pros and cons of
> deprecating evolution-patches and using bugzilla as the treasure
> bag for patches.
>
>
> A quick recap of the main points in favor of Bugzilla -
> * we tend to 'lose' patches in e-p. Bugzilla is more sticky.
> * easier for downstream packagers to release updates.
> * b.g.o can be queried for un/reviewed patches.
>
> the other side of the coin :
> * bgo is much slower than reading mails
> * you need to be on-line to pull down the patches.
>
> Fresh thoughts, any ?
>
> -Harish
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
fejj ximian com - www.novell.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]