Re: [Evolution-hackers] Performance with Exchange 2003

[Lee Revell <rlrevell joe-job com>]

On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 17:14 +0530, Not Zed wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 21:34 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: 
> > On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 13:53 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 11:53 +0530, Not Zed wrote:
> > > > Could you try the attached patch to camel?  It removes most of the
> > > > one-at-a-time stuff from the core camel objects.
> > > > 
> > > > It might make a difference, or it might not - there patches of code in
> > > > mail which might need similar treatment.
> > > 
> > > The patch did not seem to make a difference.  Here's a full backtrace.
> > 
> > As a matter of fact, the patch causes Evolution to consume 100% of the
> > CPU.  It would appear that the locking is still buggy.  I'll post more
> > info if I can get it.
> 
> I wonder where.  Its probably that the patch is buggy

Actually I don't think your patch was the problem.  Seems to have been a
gtkhtml issue.

Lee