Re: [Evolution-hackers] Performance with Exchange 2003

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 21:34 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 13:53 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 11:53 +0530, Not Zed wrote:
> > > Could you try the attached patch to camel?  It removes most of the
> > > one-at-a-time stuff from the core camel objects.
> > > 
> > > It might make a difference, or it might not - there patches of code in
> > > mail which might need similar treatment.
> > 
> > The patch did not seem to make a difference.  Here's a full backtrace.
>
> As a matter of fact, the patch causes Evolution to consume 100% of the
> CPU.  It would appear that the locking is still buggy.  I'll post more
> info if I can get it.

I wonder where.  Its probably that the patch is buggy, not the locking.

The backtraces you're getting are a little off, but it appears to be while searching the sub-folders of the vfolder - but its hard to tell exactly where it is after that ...