Re: [Evolution-hackers] gnutls v1.2.x vs 1.0.xx

[JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>]

On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 22:37 +0000, smurfd wrote:
> Hey!
> 
> So, a while ago, i started this thread :
> http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/evolution-hackers/2005-June/005877.html
> 
> and well, after a while (2 days ago) i switched back to gentoo. 
> This time, doing a so called Stable install, keeping the version of
> packages to a lower verison. Like, gnome 2.8 versus gnome 2.10.
> 
> Now things compiled fine!
> 
> What i *belive* has something to do with my problem Could probably be gnutls. 
> 
> The version that is shipped with most distributions, is a 1.0.1x. .15,.16,.17.
> I dont know about other unstable/testing releases, but gentoo ships
> their testing release with a 1.2.xx version, namely 1.2.4 with their
> testing releas.

libsoup uses gnutls.

2005-03-09  Dan Winship  <danw novell com>

	* libsoup/soup-gnutls.c (soup_gnutls_read): return G_IO_STATUS_EOF
	if gnutls returns 0. [#73352]
	(verify_certificate): put an #ifdef around
	GNUTLS_CERT_NOT_TRUSTED so it works with gnutls 1.2.x. [#57811]

> 
> Sooo. this is just a theory so far, i mean, evolution uses mozillas
> libnss wich in turn might use gnutls. Im not sure, as i said, just a
> theory.

libnss does not use gnutls.

-JP
-- 
JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Novell, Inc.