Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel interfaces



sounds cool, but where's the patch? :)

Jeff

On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 17:38 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> 
> Well, work in progress patch below, as seen on the blog.
> 
> The idea is to add interfaces to camel objects, this would let us do
> some things we currently have to extend every class for.
> 
> It might make it easier to support e.g. public folders, and so on.  We
> can just add an IPublicFolder interface to the store class rather than
> having to put in dummy callbacks for all stores.  Interfaces fix a lot
> of the locking issues too, by forcing each implementation to do all
> the work rather than try to inherit some stuff which just interferes
> with it.
> 
> I have an example 'interface' in camel-store in the patch, for
> subscriptions, although nothing is hooked up (nor is any of it tested
> yet apart from compiling).
> 
> (another one of the 'big things' i'm trying to get out the way before
> the eventual shift to a separate camel, in eds or otherwise).
> 
> -- 
> 
> Michael Zucchi <notzed ximian com>
> "I'm stuck in a reality I can't
> imagine could be real."
> Novell's Evolution and Free
> Software Developer
-- 
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
fejj ximian com  - www.novell.com

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]