Re: [Evolution-hackers] Regarding a mail Exporter.
- From: smurfd <smurfd smurfnet homelinux net>
- To: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- Cc: evolution-hackers lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Regarding a mail Exporter.
- Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 15:41:06 +0100
tis 2004-03-09 klockan 09.54 skrev Not Zed:
> On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 02:54 +0100, smurfd wrote:
>
> > Hello Evolution-hackers!
> >
> > I have been in touch with this subject earlier (it was some time ago, a
> > couple of months maby, i asked about a mail exporter).
> > Then i got a answer, that it was thought of, but not implemented..
> >
> > So, to make a long story shorter, i created a patch to one of the
> > bounties, regarding the mailer. Though, i was pretty late :(
> >
> > But, anyway, this was a carrot for me to learn about GTK-development and
> > also to learn abit about the Evolution-development.
> > So, while i got things abit fresh in memmory, i thought that i could try
> > to create such an mail-exporter.. ie a thing that would move, and or Tar
> > a mail (sub)directory to another place for backup.
> >
> > I come so far, that i kindof know where to put a function, handling the
> > exporting, from a right-click-folder menu.
> > Wich prompts a file-selector that wich you would point to the directory
> > where you want it exported.
> >
> > (im thinking of then, adding a window, after one hit the OK button, that
> > would give you options to run it to a compression filter (ie, Tar it
> > etc).
> > Still im clueless on how to do the actual moving of files, the Evolution
> > way. I mean, i had a look on the importer things, but they are well
> > baked together with all the source all around..
> > My plan right now, temporary of course, just to get an working example,
> > is to make it run a system() call.. yes, ugly hack (TM).
> >
> > And that my friends, is why im writing this..
>
> > Any ideas, any suggestions?!
>
> You probably want to open each folder using camel, and then write each
> message out to a file or a new folder. Depending on what message format
> you want.
>
> Note that we already have a 'save as ...' menu item, which essentially
> 'exports' the currently selected messages in the current folder to a
> berkely mailbox format ('mbox') file. The way this works would be a
> basis for most of the functionality.
>
> Also note that anything to do with camel/etc should run in another
> thread, and conversely, anything that runs in another thread can't do
> any gtk+ stuff. We've got a bunch of frameworks for managing thread
> pools and passing data and status messages back and forth, but it isn't
> terribly well documented.
Ah, i see, save as .. you say, ill look into it. Thanks.
Okey, and that should be located int the camel/ folder, right, even the
framework stuff?
> > Ps. bare with me, ive only been doing gtk development for a couple of
> > weeks (2-3) .. but i see alot of kindof-similarities to Java's Swing GUI
> > wich i know alot about doing stuff with.
> >
> > Ps. some constructive critisism :
> > One or two lines of comments about what a function does, wouldnt hurt.
> > Why not do like, that if someone changes something in a function on the
> > CVS, that they add two lines of comments.. that way, it wouldnt be,
> > like, "oh, i got 50000 functions to write about, *sigh*" .. as an
> > example ..
>
> The mailer code has a *lot* more comments than just about any other
> gnome or gtk+ application, from what i've seen. Many external entry
> points in most files are documented.
>
> > void
> > /* This function, handles the the user input, that is given
> > ** from the file-selector window
> > **/
> > em_function_x()
>
> FWIW you always want to put the comments above the complete function
> declaration. Makes it a lot more readable. i.e. not between the return
> type and the function name.
Okidoki, well as i said, havent been looking into much of gtk/gnome code.
It is all so very different, comment/documentation wise, i mean, some tend to comment the code Too much,
wich just makes it hard to follow..
Though, Java has a nice thing, called javadoc wich creates an API similar html documentation from a .java code,
if you only have a sertain look of the comments about each function, makes documentation alot easier..
though, i guess you have heard of it. :)
Thanks for taking time to answer.
/smurfd a.k.a Nicklas Boman
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]