Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution.Importer.createControl
- From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- To: JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
- Cc: evolution-hackers ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution.Importer.createControl
- Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 14:40:58 +0800
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 23:56 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 04:19, Not Zed wrote:
> > In response to my mail on evolution@, someone suggested we make a syncml
> > based interface so that others could write the importers (?more?
> > easily?). I guess that could be an idea, if it can support enough info
> > anyway (accounts, filters?, folders, etc), although the overhead of
> > going through XML would be extremely prohibitive for mailboxes - there
> > can be a LOT of data to import, and it can be slow enough going fd-
> > >memory->fd as it is. Maybe another future bounty though?
>
> The problem with syncml (at least last time i checked) is that it is not
> guaranteed patent free and its controlled by a consortium. We could
Ahh joy. Now i know a reason to reject it at least, apart from 'it
sounds like a stupid idea, and the name sucks too'. :)
> re-investigate that i guess.
I guess if they really want it, a plugin is a possibility.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]