Re: [Evolution-hackers] composer: individual component?

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

I agree with Jeff on this.  The composer isn't remotely separate from the mail code.

The filter stuff is different, it is used for searches in other components.

It should probably be a subdir of but linked directly into e-util or widgets.

e-util vs widgets should probably be worked out too.  e-util should probably only have utility stuff not widget related, etc.

On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 10:45 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> because it's tied to the mailer code. same with the filter code.
>
> these directories should probably just be subdirs of the mail srcdir.
>
> Jeff
>
> On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 08:15, Christian Neumair wrote:
> > When hacking around today I noted that doing make && make install in
> > composer/ didn't change anything. I had to recompile mail/ and make
> > install that as well. In my opinion we should losen the mail component
> > and the composer part, maybe it is even possible to move the composer
> > into its own component or at least into a shared lib. I don't know the
> > reason why libcomposer is noinst.
> > 
> > regs,
> >  Chris
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > evolution-hackers maillist  -  evolution-hackers lists ximian com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
> > 
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution-hackers maillist  -  evolution-hackers lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

--

Michael Zucchi <notzed ximian com> Ximian Evolution and Free Software Developer