Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: please help me to have a look at this.

[Radek Doulík <rodo ximian com>]

On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 09:02 +0800, Not Zed wrote:

> the only way i see this being fixed is for the gtkhtml editor to say 'oh
> the user REALLY meant to insert a http link' and make it a non-relative
> url.

yeah, that make sense. we may add http:// prefix to relative links if
base url is not set (which can't be done from gui yet anyway)

it will not solve it for html mails from other clients, but html
specifications says documents without base with relative links are
erroneous anyway.

Radek

> the em-no-cid thing is just a side-effect, and it has to be there for
> html mails.
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 12:04 +0800, Bill Zhu wrote:
> 
> > yeah,I have looked through the 1.5, the situation is almost the same.
> > 
> > On 二, 2004-02-17 at 19:52 +0100, Radek Doulík wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 11:26 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Radek: you seem to be discussing 1.5, while Bill seems to be talking
> > > > about 1.4
> > > > 
> > > > which branch is the bug actually in?
> > > 
> > > I guess the bug is in both branches (I checked 1.5.x) Only the protocol
> > > name changed? (cid: --> em-no-cid:)
> > > 
> > > Radek
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > evolution-hackers maillist  -  evolution-hackers lists ximian com
> > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > evolution-hackers maillist  -  evolution-hackers lists ximian com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
-- 
Radek Doulík <rodo ximian com>