Re: [Evolution-hackers] Regarding the Inline-pgp bounty?!

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

Dunno where that number came from, probably a cut and paste mistake.
Its obviously wrong, 2440 looks right.

If you want to look at the current source, you should use cvs, that also
provides a bunch of tools for looking at version differences, merging
changes, and investigating the history of the file.

Someone has already done some work on this bounty, if you click on the
bug number on the bounty page, it shows some discussion and patches
implemented so far.

If you don't understand what 'inling pgp support' means, then perhaps
you could try a different bounty :)



On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 05:08 +0100, smurfd wrote:

> Hey there, Evolution folks!
> 
> I was wondering if the bounty-site is up-to-date in means of wich
> bounties is done and not?
> 
> some nit-picking, the RFC referenced to from the inline pgp bounty,
> rfc2298 i guess is wrong, and i guess it was ment to reference to 
> rfc2440 - Open PGP Message format.
> 
> But, then i also guess that it was your intentions to get a "warning"
> when someone started working on it, right? :) 
> 
> Just joking!!
> 
> Anyhow, the file : 
> mail/em-format-html-display.c
> 
> What has happened to it since evolution version 1.5.3 (wich is the
> version that debian-experimental holds)
> It said something about that it was under development..
> 
> And just for the record, inline pgp is the thing when a public key is
> inserted in a mail.. to "sign" it, right?
> 
> Best regards, 
> -- 
> smurfd <smurfd smurfnet homelinux net> 
> aka Nicklas Boman
> 
> _______________________________________________
> evolution-hackers maillist  -  evolution-hackers lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers