Re: [Evolution-hackers] Do we need camel/camel-i18n.h?
- From: Christian Neumair <chris gnome-de org>
- To: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
- Cc: evolution-hackers ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Do we need camel/camel-i18n.h?
- Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 19:31:05 +0100
On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 11:12 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> what is gi18n.h? where does it come from? I presume it comes from glib?
> but which version? we can only use it if it is from glib 2.2
I wrote this mail after the following commit:
2004-01-28 Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
* configure.in: Update to require glib-2.0 >= 2.3.2 (needed for
some GValue usage).
unfortunately you reverted this change although GTK+ 2.4 and therefore
GNOME 2.6 depend on GLib 2.3. I cannot understand why you reverted this
commit again :/.
Besides, we could use gnome-i18n.h, too.
> On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 07:53, Christian Neumair wrote:
> > Currently, Camel uses Evo's gettext domain if
> > CAMEL_EXPLICIT_TRANSLATION_DOMAIN isn't defined (see camel/camel-i18n.
> > h). Therefore we could simply include gi18n.h instead of having custom
> > defines.
> > Does this variable make sense at all?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]