Re: [Evolution-hackers] Do we need camel/camel-i18n.h?



On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 11:12 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> what is gi18n.h? where does it come from? I presume it comes from glib?
> but which version? we can only use it if it is from glib 2.2

I wrote this mail after the following commit:

2004-01-28  Jeffrey Stedfast  <fejj ximian com>
                                                                                
        * configure.in: Update to require glib-2.0 >= 2.3.2 (needed for
        some GValue usage).

unfortunately you reverted this change although GTK+ 2.4 and therefore
GNOME 2.6 depend on GLib 2.3. I cannot understand why you reverted this
commit again :/.
Besides, we could use gnome-i18n.h, too.

> On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 07:53, Christian Neumair wrote:
> > Currently, Camel uses Evo's gettext domain if
> > CAMEL_EXPLICIT_TRANSLATION_DOMAIN isn't defined (see camel/camel-i18n.
> > h). Therefore we could simply include gi18n.h instead of having custom
> > defines.
> > Does this variable make sense at all?




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]