Re: [Evolution-hackers] ssl always/when-possible/never etc proposal

On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 10:55 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
I think this is a much better idea - because the user knows exactly what they're getting.  With whenever possible, there is no way to tell what is happening.  I guess some could argue users dont want to know, but i think they do want to know if they're connected using an open channel when they thought they were using a secure one.

Also, I'd love to see the (security) status of the communication on the send-receive dialog. At least a lock sign or something.
Enver ALTIN                   |
Software developer @ Parkyeri |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]