Re: [Evolution-hackers] questionable config choice in calendar/eds
- From: JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
- To: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- Cc: Evolution Hackers' mailing list <evolution-hackers lists ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] questionable config choice in calendar/eds
- Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 10:12:30 -0400
On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 21:36 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
>
> What does, that its wrong, or that its right?
>
> On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 09:11 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 07:15 +0000, Not Zed wrote:
> > >
> > > i noticed this in config.h, which seems wrong considering how things
> > > are threaded in eds.
> > >
> > > /* Define if we want _REENTRANT */
> > > /* #undef ICAL_REENTRANT */
> >
> >
> > Makes sense to me.
That its wrong not to be undefined, given that at the very least libical
uses errno.
-JP
--
JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Novell, Inc.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]