Re: [Evolution-hackers] questionable config choice in calendar/eds



On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 21:36 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> 
> What does, that its wrong, or that its right?
> 
> On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 09:11 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote: 
> > On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 07:15 +0000, Not Zed wrote:
> > > 
> > > i noticed this in config.h, which seems wrong considering how things
> > > are threaded in eds.
> > > 
> > > /* Define if we want _REENTRANT */
> > > /* #undef ICAL_REENTRANT */
> > 
> > 
> > Makes sense to me.

That its wrong not to be undefined, given that at the very least libical
uses errno.

-JP
-- 
JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Novell, Inc.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]