Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution-data-server details

On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 07:01, JP Rosevear wrote:
> 2. What to call the backend libraries
> The backends were called pas and pcs and name spaced as such.  With the
> client libs being libecal and libebook, and all of this being in
> evolution-data-server, I named the backend bits libedatabook and
> libedatacal.  Obviously, these names need some work.  The main problem
> is too have the corba objects in the backend (like the book, the book
> view and book factory) not conflict with the client name for the C
> wrappers to said objects nor the C classes that do the actual work which
> are called by the corba objects (e-book-backend-file, which derives from
> e-book-backend).
why not use a eds_ prefix for all backend-related functions, and put
those in a libedataserver library. I don't think it adds too much
overhead to have both the calendar and addressbook backend-related code
in the same library.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]