[Fwd: [Evolution-hackers] Re: about evolution imap local email storage]
- From: Antonio Xu <antonio xu sun com>
- To: "evolution-hackers lists ximian com" <evolution-hackers lists ximian com>
- Subject: [Fwd: [Evolution-hackers] Re: about evolution imap local email storage]
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 13:07:49 +0800
Hello All
I have to resend this email to discuss with you guys. Now, mail begin to
rewrite, I hope the issue below can be solved in mail rewriting. I just
want to who and when it can be done .
Best reagrds,
Anto
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Evolution-hackers] Re: about evolution imap local email storage
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 12:54:57 +0800
From: Antonio Xu <antonio xu sun com>
To: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
CC: Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>,
"evolution-hackers lists ximian com"
<evolution-hackers lists ximian com>, Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
References: <3E9C1E53 6000302 sun com>
<1050519111 6052 29 camel lostzed mmc com au>
Hello, Not Zed
I have discussed this issue with Fejj. I think it is possible
to add a feature which is allow user specify whether make evolution copy
email to local. So for Sun Ray customer, they can make evolution leave
eamil on server instead of copy them to local. this feature is very
userful for intranet user too, they don't need to worry about intranet
status, they could turn off the switch and make evolution leave email on
server without copying them to local. I think it is very useful feature,
but I wanto to know when we can add this feature in evolution, Could you
show me the date when we can doing it for evolution?
I have added some comments below. Please read it.
Best regards,
Anto
Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 00:29, Antonio Xu wrote:
Hello, NotZed
I have some questions about imap local email storage. I found
evolution will copy every readed email's source and its html body to
local. so if I have 1 GB emails on server, I would have 2 GB emails in
local imap storage. I think it is a very serious problem. Why did
Do you have 1GB of email on your server? i.e. just saying a problem is
possible doesn't mean it occurs or in practice is a real issue.
We realy have some customers whose email more than 1GB on imap server.
For Sun Ray customer, whose home direcotory leave on server, if
evolution copy every imap email to local, and leave original email on
imap server. it will waste storage of server.
evolution copy every readed email to local? Could we remove this bad
Because the imap 'cache' isn't really a cache, and it was written pretty
simply.
feature? I think we should leave emails on server instead of copy it at
local, that is why we using IMAP. I know this feature will be helpful
I'm not sure we want to remove it. Because it provides a transparent
and more complete 'offline' mode. Without it we may need to re-copy
stuff for offline mode operation back off the server when we go back
offline, because, because of the way offline mode works, the imap code
deosn't know what files are needed for offline mode until it actually
goes offline. If you are going offline, and you're using a modem, the
last thing you want is to have to re-copy mails that got expired from
your cache.
In fact, we don't need to remove this feature, but we must add a switch
to allow user specify whether make evolution copy email to local.
when evolution switch to offline, but evolution have another feature
which can allow user download every email from server before switch
evolution to offline. I suggest this issue should be solved before
evolution 1.4 release. I have seen your and fejj's comment on bug
#21894. When will you begin solving this issue?
Well, the newer/next version of outlook always works off local email,
and only uses the server connection to download the mail once/as a
backup. It goes into 'offline' mode implictly, hiding the
network/server problems from the user, and letting them take more
advantage of the local grunt computer workstations now posess.
So this way of working isn't completely unexpected/different from other
similar mail clients, and takes advantage of vastly under-utilised
resources on most desktop machines.
Its also way too big a change to be going into 1.4 at this point.
I know it is too hurry to add this feature into 1.4, but when can we
begin doing it?
_______________________________________________
evolution-hackers maillist - evolution-hackers lists ximian com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]