Re: [Evolution-hackers] about Evolution's CVS branch
- From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- To: Antonio Xu <antonio xu sun com>
- Cc: Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>, "evolution-hackers lists ximian com" <evolution-hackers lists ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] about Evolution's CVS branch
- Date: 21 Jul 2003 15:55:56 +0930
Just my 5¢ worth ...
I didn't even know that branch existed (does it even make sense? are we
ever going to release 1.4.3.1 for example?). I would suggest, like me,
you do your head work on the trunk and stable stuff on
evolution-1-4-branch, and ignore the subbranches.
Michael
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 14:29, Antonio Xu wrote:
> Hello Ettore,
>
> I have a question about Evolution's branch, what is the difference of
> branch between evolution-1-4-3-branch and evolution-1-4-branch? It is
> seems evolution-1-4-3-branch should be more fresh branch of evolution.
> But I found evolution-1.4 branch is more fresh than 1.4.3 branch. I was
> confuese for it. Can you show me why we need evolution 1.4.3 branch? and
> what is its use for?
>
> Thanks
> Anto
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution-hackers maillist - evolution-hackers lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]