Re: [Evolution-hackers] ebook api plans for 1.6

[Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>]

Hi Chris,

On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 01:58, Chris Toshok wrote:
> These two functions are just sugar around g_object_set/g_object_get at
> the moment.. They don't necessarily need to be there at all, but if they
> are I'd like them to remain easier/less typing than g_object_set/get,
> not more :)

	Ah - ok :-) of course g_object_set/get gives a really tight, implicit
contract too I suppose.

> yeah, definitely.  I'll add those tonight.

	Great :-)

	Regards,

		Michael.

-- 
 michael ximian com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot