Re: [Evolution-hackers] Build FAQ?
- From: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo ximian com>
- To: Frank Solensky <frank solensky org>
- Cc: evolution-hackers lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Build FAQ?
- Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 20:17:03 +0100
On Sun, 2003-12-14 at 19:59, Frank Solensky wrote:
> Pardon the newbie question but is there any more detailed information
> about building Evolution?
>
> On http://www.gnome.org/projects/evolution/build.shtml:
>
> | Build the relevant modules listed on the CVS page and them.
>
> 1) Should the modules be built in any specific order?
>
yes, I do it in the following order: libsoup, gal, gtkhtml,
evolution-data-server, evolution.
> 2) "..and them". Install, right?
>
Yes, not only do you need to compile it, but to install it before
compiling the next module.
> | If you use a prefix different from where the rest of GNOME is
> | installed (recommended),
>
> 3) I'm not sure what the recommendation is: the prefix for the result of
> the evolution build?
>
no, the prefix for installing, that can be like /usr/local,
~/Applications, /opt/gnome, ...
> In evolution/README.txt:
> | In order to build Evolution you need to have the full set of GNOME 2
> | or GNOME 2.2 development libraries installed.
>
> 4) Out of date? I've got GNOME 2.4, off the Red Hat Fedora
> distribution.
>
well, it should still compile on 2.0 and 2.2, at least the 1.4.x
versions.
> | .. Evolution REQUIRES libdb 3.1.17, and NO OTHER VERSION.
>
> 5) Still true?
>
not for 1.5.x.
> I'll admit it. Getting the link to http://www.gnome.org/bounties/ was
> enough incentive for me to try to add one or two things myself, even if
> I don't eventually claim one.
>
> 6) The blog page announces some of the enhancements already being
> completed (sorry about Ettore): where does one go to see what's already
> underway? Or is the blog what's current?
>
see the bug numbers associated with each bounty.
cheers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]