Re: [Evolution-hackers] BUG with the EHLO command in SMTP authentication
- From: Petri Kanerva <petri kanerva surfeu fi>
- To: evolution-hackers lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] BUG with the EHLO command in SMTP authentication
- Date: 29 Aug 2003 22:31:01 +0300
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 22:40, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> If you read the SASL AUTH specification for SMTP, it says explicitly
> that clients MUST re EHLO after a successful AUTH because all
> capabilities listed by the first EHLO response no longer apply.
>
> This is not a bug.
I know, as said, this is wrong list for the whole discussion, and my
reply doesn't have any purpose, but I just have to say this.
In that case it is a bug, not in Evo, but in Microsofts product. But
that's not anything new...
> On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 15:21, Khiraly wrote:
> > I've found the following BUG in evolution: The SMTP server of my ISP
> > demand AUTH to send (forward) mails. It's pity that EVOLUTION(1.4.4)
> > sends EHLO 2 times, and mail server (with Microsoft Exchange) demand new
> > AUTH after every EHLO, but Evolution sends no new AUTH after second
> > EHLO. Mozilla Mail doesn't have the same problem, it sends e-mails
> > flawless via same SMTP server. Here're the sniff logs:
> > Mozilla Mail: http://chocolate.inf.elte.hu/khiraly/linux/mozillamail.txt
> > (works correctly)
> > Evolution: http://chocolate.inf.elte.hu/khiraly/linux/evolution.txt (not
> > works at all)
> >
> > I hope this annoying small BUG'll be fixed soon, so we'll able to use
> > Evolution as full featured mailer client
> >
> > Thx a million,
> > Khiraly
--
"Getting an education was a lot like having a sexual disease. It made
you unsuitable to a lot of jobs and you had the urge to pass it on."
- A weirdo quoting PTerry to me in an email.
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]