Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: [evolution-patches] Fix mailto: handling of arbitrary headers.
- From: Larry Ewing <lewing ximian com>
- To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org>
- Cc: Evolution Hackers <evolution-hackers ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: [evolution-patches] Fix mailto: handling of arbitrary headers.
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 10:43:22 -0500
I'm not sure if this actually applies to this code path but if the
launch from command line mailto: handling passes through here it would
definitely seem appropriate to be able to set the From header to any one
of the configured accounts.
--Larry
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 10:17, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 15:57 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Against -HEAD.
>
> Was going to resend for 1.4 branch too but in fact the changelog applies
> cleanly there too.
>
> > + } else if (!strncasecmp (header, "from", len) ||
> > + !strncasecmp (header, "reply-to", len)) {
> > + /* FIXME: Warn about nasty mailto: link? */
>
> Looking at §7 of RFC2368 this isn't necessarily enough... I suspect we
> should have two lists of headers we know about...
>
> 1. 'Safe' headers: CC, Subject, References, etc.
> Always allow a mailto: link to set these.
>
> 2. 'Unsafe' headers: From, Reply-To, etc.
> Never allow a mailto: link to set these.
>
> 3. Others.
> Ask the user for permission before allowing them?
>
> Certainly the current behaviour of just putting them into the mail we
> send is not encouraged by either the RFC or common sense :)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]