Re: [Evolution-hackers] Spam filtering thoughts

[Chris Toshok <toshok ximian com>]

On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 15:32, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> > Yeah, easy.  Although then we run the risk of people who aren't using
> > spam filters being duped by spam adding that header and saying it isn't
> > spam.  So it would probably have to be an explicit option for
> > environments where the x-spam-status can be trusted.
> 
> Hmm good point.  I guess we could have a "trust existing message spam
> status" setting?  It might be confusing though.

Do we really need to worry about this?  It seems odd to not trust this
setting, since the only time you'll get a false negative is when people
are up to no good anyway.

Chris