Re: [Evolution-hackers] CamelFolder updates
- From: NotZed <notzed helixcode com>
- To: danw helixcode com (Dan Winship)
- Cc: evolution-hackers helixcode com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] CamelFolder updates
- Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 14:49:20 -0400 (EDT)
> list_subfolders and get_uid_list both return GLists. I think GPtrArray
> is a generally more useful type, since it's randomly accessible and
> has a "length" element. Also, list_subfolders returns actual
> CamelFolders, and I think there are cases where you'd rather have just
> the names. (There are no places that actually call list_subfolders
> currently.)
>
> So my new proposal is to get rid of get_subfolder_info,
> get_message_info, list_subfolders, and get_uid_list and replace them
> with:
>
> GPtrArray *get_uids (CamelFolder *, CamelException *);
> void free_uids (CamelFolder *, GPtrArray *);
>
> GPtrArray *get_subfolder_names (CamelFolder *, CamelException *);
> void free_subfolder_names (CamelFolder *, GPtrArray *);
>
> GPtrArray *get_summary (CamelFolder *, CamelException *);
> void free_summary (CamelFolder *, GPtrArray *);
These should only return pointers to the internal arrays, or
otherwise const'd data.
Why?
- save overhead of copying and gptrarrays are prtty slow anyway.
- The contents if it is a pointer array is only as safe as
the real array is. Unless the interface actually copies all
of the elements data as well, which is well, not worth it.
- the folder_changed signal indicates when any such data is
stale and needs to be re-retrieved anyway.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]