Re: Bookmark depth in 2.14

[Peter Harvey <peter a harvey gmail com>]

Hi Magnus,

You might be able to make the "Shared" topic have a high "priority" as
it's not a user topic. Similar topics like "Most Visited" also have a
higher priority. Topics with these "higher" priorities are not used in
menu construction.

This would have to be done in code by the Epilicious extension itself.

Regards,
Peter.

On Fri, 2006-04-14 at 16:17 +0100, Magnus Therning wrote:
> I was so looking forward to Epiphany 2.14 after reading the document on
> the new organisation of bookmarks, how the menu now is dynamically
> created with a menu hierarchy that somewhat reflects the "popularity" of
> topics (I've lost the reference to the document, and I don't know how
> to explain it better but I'm sure you understand what I mean). I didn't
> fully predict the result of this on my own set of bookmarks though.
> 
> I'm using Epilicious[1] to share bookmarks between the computers I'm
> using (via del.icio.us). The extension (mis)uses a topic to mark a
> bookmark as shared. With the new organisation of bookmarks this means
> that the "Share" topic is the most popular one and it shows up as one
> out of two topics on the top-level (since all other topics show up in
> bookmarks who also have the "Share" topic).
> 
> Is there currently some way around this?
> Can I make "Share" a `bookmark non grata' when creating the bookmarks
> menu?
> Can I force epiphany to revert to the old layout?
> 
> I've seen discussions on topics on this list before. IIRC there was a
> second concept thrown around as well, like `attribute' or something.
> This second concept might be a better choice for marking bookmarks
> shared.
> 
> /M
> 
> 1. http://therning.org/magnus/computer/epilicious/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> epiphany-list mailing list
> epiphany-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list