Re: [Epiphany] Favicon bug



Lee Willis <lwillis@plus.net> writes:

> Bearing this in mind then the folder concept of traditional bookmarks is
> largely irrelevant. So too is your keyword implementation. I can see it
> being useful for people who have lots of bookmarks, however Joe Bloggs
> doesn't his browser to ask him for a title and what keywords should be
> stored for a site, they just want the browser to remember this page for
> later.
> 
> One solution (Nasty that it is!) would be to store the page content, and
> do a grep when someone searches for a keyword. [It's like having your
> own personal google][1]. That would rock!. How easy it is to get to that
> point I don't know, but if it did that and all the key navigation was
> right it would be perfect. [Of course we should still allow users to
> associate keywords if they want - for example to group all of their work
> bookmarks - but I think that's a slightly different concept to the one
> you've made right now]

Entirely coincidentally a similar concept has just cropped up on
slashdot:

http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/03/01/03/1324239.shtml?tid=121

Lee
-- 
| Lee Willis                                  Unmetered & ADSL solutions 
| Products and Services Development Co-ordinator     for Home & Business 
| PlusNet Technologies Ltd.                        @ http://www.plus.net
+------------ My Referrals - It pays to recommend PlusNet --------------



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]