Re: [Fwd: lots of useless EOG stacktraces]

[Claudio Saavedra <csaavedra alumnos utalca cl>]

On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 17:17 -0300, Claudio Saavedra wrote:
> Andre,
> 
> Forwarding to the appropriate list, thanks for the concern and your
> work!
> 
> Claudio
> email message attachment, "Forwarded message - lots of useless EOG
> stacktraces"
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>
> > To: csaavedra alumnos utalca cl, lucasr at mundo gmail com
> > Subject: lots of useless EOG stacktraces
> > Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:15:00 +0100
> > 
> > [in reference to: http://blogs.gnome.org/view/aklapper/2006/12/06/0 ]
> > 
> > 
> > hej folks,
> > a lot of EOG crash reports are totally useless (137 needinfo bugs in the
> > last 2 weeks) and have totally useless stacktraces (e.g. totally empty
> > stacktraces like http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381577 ).
> > 
> > if i would ask the reporter to install additional debug packages, which
> > ones do you need for gnome-commander?
> > gtk, glib, libgnomeui, libgnome, pango, gnome-vfs?
> > anything i've forgotten, or definitely not needed? enlighten me! :-)
> > (unfortunately ubuntu (where the most reports come from) does not have
> > debug packages for EOG itself.)

Depending on the version, you should recommend to install also
libgnomeprint debug packages, because eog < 2.17.2 requires it. I think
that would be all.

Claudio

-- 
Claudio Saavedra <csaavedra alumnos utalca cl>