Re: GNOME files disabled

[Thilo Pfennig <tp pfennigsolutions de>]

Simos Xenitellis schrieb:
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 6:34 AM, Thilo Pfennig <tp pfennigsolutions de> wrote:
>   
> > Claus Schwarm schrieb:
> >     
> > > It's just not as efficient as for other platforms because releases are
> > > rather boring if they cannot be installed easily and immediately. That
> > > was the central problem of gnomefiles.
> > >
> > >
> > >       
> > Not specific to gnomefiles.org. Thats the same problem gnome.org has.
> > Like new GNOME but you have to compile yourself. Also same problem most
> > linuxbased FLOSS has.
> >     
>
> The importance I can see with gnomefiles.org is that it focuses on
> intermediate users,
> those that can afford to install some development packages, then run
> ./configure, make, sudo make install.
> These users have a higher chance to pick up a project of their own,
> and convert to GNOME developers later on.
>
> Simos
>   

Maybe a revision based directory would be cool. Like every distro has
another version of an application. They then could link to one directory
with &version=2.22&rev=0 or so - this would enable the view of one
application to be exact that of the linked version. So actually very
wiki-like, except that the revisions would be hardcoded. So this
descriptions could be used by every package manager and distribution.
Distributions may want to add some bits if they patch a version. But
that would be much nicer than of every distro needs to essentially copy
and paste the same bits. This could also be matched to a RSS feed, so
that people see when which version or description was updated.

Regards,
Thilo

-- 
Thilo Pfennig - PfennigSolutions IT-Beratung- Wiki-Systeme
Sandkrug 28 - 24143 Kiel (Germany)
http://www.pfennigsolutions.de/
XING: https://www.xing.com/profile/Thilo_Pfennig -
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/tpfennig