Re: Issuing a press release about GNOME 3



Dave Neary wrote:
I think we need to wrap this up as like this, and no more:

We're moving to a 6 month/2 year time-based cycle. Our first 2-year
cycle started in March (that means we're now behind schedule! Ouch!)

2 year cycle: Identify big overriding theme - current low-hanging fruit
would be web integration, presence, geo-positioning, IM - the platform
for these exists, all that is needed is to turn that into real
user-available features - for each application or group of applications,
do the specification work (eg. Rhythmbox with an "Upcoming concerts from
this artist (and similar artists) in your area" - information all
available from Last.fm and geoclue - would rock). We're not going to get
all this done in one cycle, but it creates a goal, something to aim for
& push people towards

6-month cycle: As you were. Keeps platform & apps stable and evolving.

For the moment, we've decided to move to the cycle. Now we need to have
a process which arrives at a finality - realistic user-targetted goals
which will benefit users, and not have us drowning in a massive rewrite.

Here's the graphic I threw together this afternoon to use as a slide.
Nothing very spectacular. But it communicates the idea, I think...

Cheers,
Dave.

-- 
Dave Neary
GNOME Foundation member
bolsh gnome org

PNG image



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]