Re: Fwd: wgo revamp showstoppers
- From: Andreas Nilsson <nisses mail home se>
- To: Quim Gil <qgil gnome org>
- Cc: GNOME Marketing List <marketing-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Fwd: wgo revamp showstoppers
- Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 02:28:34 +0100
Hi Quim!
Quim Gil wrote:
On 3/7/07, Andreas Nilsson <nisses mail home se> wrote:
Do we need graphics for all the pages, or are some more critical than
others?
Critical-critical there is nothing critical if we consider that the
main reference now is to improve the current wgo - which is really dry
on graphics.
(snip)
- The Logo & trademarks page needs a GNOME logo, obviously. :)
Can we more or less cut&paste this?
http://live.gnome.org/BrandGuidelines
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/RevampShowstoppers updated, I have put
"Important" in the pages where graphics are... important.
http://gnome.jardigrec.eu/en/get-started - done
http://andreasn.se/diverse/temp/king-size/package-128.png
http://andreasn.se/diverse/temp/king-size/package-256.png
http://andreasn.se/diverse/temp/king-size/package.svg
More stuff will follow. Thanks for the pointers!
- Andreas
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]