Re: redifining GNOME office.



I definately agree.  Not sure I agree with wikipedia says makes up
GNOME Office.  But we need something that we can say works together,
abiword, gnumeric and gnome-db for sure.  We still need a presentation
app, criawips also seems dead.  Lets get these revitalized.

I know people just say OpenOffice.org is good enough, I simply don't
agree.  Yes it is very full featured and pretty compatible with M$
Office.  However, it isn't well integrated in GNOME.  One of the
things I love about GNOME is out well integrated things are.  But OOo
has it's own print dialog... just for a simple example.  We need
something to fill this void.

I don't think GNOME Office should be a product by itself, but more of
a collaboration of other projects to play well together.  The biggest
issue I see right now is the lack of a impress alternative.  Anyone
know the status of criawips?

--Ken

On 4/4/07, Thilo Pfennig <thilopfennig foresightlinux org> wrote:
Hi,

I suggest we redefine GNOME Office. See als this bug:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422337.

The Wikipedia website says
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Office



The Ubuntu 6.10 documentation also includes the following as part of the
GNOME Office product suite:
Dia, a diagram editor
Inkscape, a vector graphics editor
 The GIMP, the classic image editor
Planner, a project management solution I suggest that rather than every
distribution does its own definition we agree to extend the concept and also
to work again on this field. This also means that we should encourage to
work on the weakness. Like that we still miss a presentation program.

Would like to see some other opinions on this topic.


Thilo

--
Thilo Pfennig
http://issues.foresightlinux.org/confluence/x/R
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]