Re: GNOME Logo Branding Guidelines Concerns
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Máirín Duffy <duffy redhat com>
- Cc: marketing-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME Logo Branding Guidelines Concerns
- Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:46:59 +0200
On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 10:50 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
[snip]
(2) Do you think the 'creative' sublogos approach is entirely more
risk
than it is worth? Should we just not allow for sublogos, or only
allow
for sublogos that use the 'stock' GNOME foot logomark?
[snip]
Máirín is asking this partly because I think that some of the existing
sub-logos on that page break our own rules about how to use the logo.
For instance, not using complex pattern fills (instead of a solid
color), and not letting other elements (the cup or the brush) overlap or
collide with the logo.
I think these rules are important
- to keep the brand visually distinct
and
- because I think the lawyers told the board that it was necessary.
Thanks Máirín.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]