On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 11:36 +0200, Thilo Pfennig wrote:
2006/10/25, Andy Fitzsimon <andyfitz gmail com>:Drupal it is ! ;-)
We have been already into this game of "I prefer this", "That is cool". If you want to be helpful selecting the CMS at this stage do the following: a) Suggest improvements to the criteria of my previous mail at http://mail.gnome.org/archives/marketing-list/2006-October/msg00078.html b) Based on these criteria, tell which candidate you find to be the less appropriate for wgo from the 5 listed at http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/CmsRequirements and why. Anything out of this risk to fall into the categories of deja-vu, noise or yet more insightful thoughts not that useful to make a good CMS selection. Sorry for setting such strict rules for this game, but it has taken too long and we need to find a common agreement on something. -- Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part