Re: GNOME Maps Updates
- From: Simos Xenitellis <simos74 gmx net>
- To: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- Cc: marketing-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME Maps Updates
- Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 04:19:43 +0000
Murray Cumming wrote:
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 01:29 +0000, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
Thanks for the update at
http://live.gnome.org/LogoGuidelines
Therefore, can we say that
"a GNOME user-group, provided they accepted the user-group licensing
agreement, has two options:
1. Use the official logo provided verbatim.
2. In case they want to add something custom like "Greek GNOME Team",
the GNOME Official logo should not be obscured
as described at http://live.gnome.org/LogoGuidelines
For example, for the second options,
a. http://planet.hellug.gr/images/gnomelivecd.png
This would be ok if only 1) if it used the official writing under the
foot, 2) it did not mention GNOME in big letters.
Yes, I think so. Only the use of a different font seems odd.
b.
http://64.34.180.159/pics2/i/20051121/d/8/6/d86b385eb3d1265a2042334a5134184b0_mid.png
This is not ok because 1) it changes the colour of the foot, 2) it does
not say GNOME in Trebuchet font under the foot, 3) the big toe is
multi-coloured (map of China)."
Yes.
I'm not sure whether we want to enforce the word GNOME and the position
of the word. The guidelines do seem to suggest that now.
I'm not sure how that would work in languages with very different scripts.
Also, shall we add "You may have noticed several Linux logos (the
penguin) are modified and Tux wears glasses, is dressed, rides a bike
and so on. We try to avoid these variations and we would like to have
the official logo stand out on its own, and you are welcome to add
something next to it. We recommend you to use Inkscape for this task and
export as PNG for best results.".?
That doesn't seem necessary to me. I'd like to keep the guidelines
simple and easy to understand.
It's good to add positive examples in addition to the existing examples
to avoid at
http://live.gnome.org/LogoGuidelines
Personally I feel that the current LogoGuidelines page is not easily
digestible.
For positive examples on the use of the Logo, you may add
http://planet.hellug.gr/images/gnomegr2.png
http://www.frappr.com/gnomeusers/
http://www.frappr.com/gnomedev/
And an unacceptable one,
http://planet.hellug.gr/misc/GNOME%20Pank%20Logo.png :)
Simos
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]