Re: real marketing or just catchy slogans?
- From: Gezim Hoxha <gezimetc telus net>
- To: gnome marketing list <marketing-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: real marketing or just catchy slogans?
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:58:22 -0700
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 11:58 +0000, Tom Chance wrote:
On Friday 09 December 2005 22:12, Gezim Hoxha wrote:
I agree that the next step would be to install Linux, however when they
are greeted by a different desktop, be it KDE or whatever, they're going
to want to know what happened to the nice looking lovely desktop (gnome)
and they'll ask their local LUG or someone who supplied the distro for
help.
How many people will have this reaction? Where's your evidence? What makes any
of you think that your personal experiences are a good guide to understanding
GNOME's target markets?
This was a pure opinion piece and I have no proof whatsoever. As far as
what makes me think that my personal experiences are a good guide to
understanding GNOME's target markets, nothing. I guess I made two
assumptions:
1.) that people like myself would be one of GNOME's target markets
2.) and I assumed people are like me (doesn't everybody?).
In my limited experience with friends and family, they've really not been too
bothered whether it was GNOME or KDE. I've had people try the Ubuntu LiveCD
and be perfectly happy when they got SuSE installed, and likewise happy when
they saw Kubuntu on my machine then got Ubuntu installed (pre-Kubuntu ;-).
Assuming the GNOME in the above distros was a version where the
Applications menu was at the top, your finding is a surprising one.
Didn't people notice that the applications menu (in KDE) is all of a
sudden at the bottom? Didn't they see the difference?
What proportion of GNOME's target markets who receive a LiveCD will know what
a LUG is, where to find one and who will actually go and ask them (and get a
good answer to) the question: "How do I replace this with GNOME?" How would
you find the answer to this question?
You make a good point. Again, I was assuming people are like me, which
isn't always the case (Surprise, surprise :). Aside: this reminds me of
Family Guy when Peter notices he's fat.
But, I guess, we shouldn't waste time discussing this, rather we should
design some sort of surveys and get our target markets to fill--first
though, we got to figure out who our target markets is and make it
official on a web site or wiki or whatver.
I find KDE more usable than GNOME.
I guess the response to that is, we don't care. Once we figure out that
you and I and Bill Roberts is in our target markets _then_ we'll want to
know about his likes and dislikes.
Without some prior analysis of GNOME's target markets it makes no sense to
talk about people who will ask their LUG or supplier; it makes no sense to
even talk about people wanting "the nice looking lovely desktop" instead of
whatever they get in the end, because you have no evidence to suggest that
(a) that's why they liked GNOME and (b) they won't think the desktop they got
wasn't also a "nice looking lovely desktop".
Well said. I completely agree.
Regards,
-Gezim
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]