Re: [Ekiga-list] Invalid Contact header field, or bug in ekiga.net?

[Jānis Rukšāns <thedogfarted gmail com>]

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Jānis Rukšāns <thedogfarted gmail com> wrote:
> Wherever the 192.168.10.6 came from, it *IS* the reason why ekiga.net
> barfs, and that is a *BUG*. Myself and others have complained about
> that since long ago, to no avail. *NOWHERE* in the SIP standards it
> says that a registrar should barf on private IPs in Via. Even more, it
> breaks clients that use SIP outbound + ICE instead of STUN to traverse
> NAT (as SIP outbound *REQUIRES* to have non-NATed address in Via).

Oh, and...

>>> Session Initiation Protocol
>>>     Status-Line: SIP/2.0 606 Not Acceptable

Quoting RFC 3261, section 10.3 Processing REGISTER Requests: "A
registrar MUST not generate 6xx responses." (the last sentence in the
first paragraph). As you can see, ekiga.net violates this one as well.

-- 
Ian