Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga on Ubuntu using DSL 302G D-Link modem
- From: ael <law_ence dev ntlworld com>
- To: Ekiga mailing list <ekiga-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Ekiga-list] Ekiga on Ubuntu using DSL 302G D-Link modem
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:50:17 +0000
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 05:56:59AM -0800, mat101 wrote:
>
> I have a DSL 302G D-link modem and I've been trying to get Ekiga voip working
> on ubuntu 8.10 without any luck, and I was wondering whether anyone might be
> able to solve this problem.
>
> I have tried setting NAT Rule Entries for various ip numbers I thought might
> be the fixed ip of my router (tried 10.1.1.1, 10.1.1.10, etc.) and included
> the requisite Ekiga ports in the NAT Rule Entries (3478-3479, 5000-5100,
> 1720), but still no sound or video.
Not quite sure what you mean above: are you trying to follow the
Ekiga-behind-a-NAT-router instructions on the wiki? If you don't know
the ip address of your router, I don't understand how you can reach it to change
the settings.
>
> Irrespective of the NAT Rule Entries I've used, running Ekiga's druid and
> clicking 'Detect NAT Type' always results in the detection of a 'Symmetric
> NAT' and Ekiga's suggestion to change it to a 'Cone NAT'. I've never been
> able to obtain a Cone NAT.
That means that your trigger rule (if you have one) isn't firing. The whole
point of the trigger is to open a small local "CONE" for the ekiga traffic.
IIRC ekiga will call this something like a "restricted CONE".
>
> I attempted to get my router ip number by running cmd.exe/ipconfig on XP
> (another partition on the same computer system) and obtained the following
> output:
>
> Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
>
> Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
> IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.1.1.10
> Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.0.0.0
> Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.1.1.1
Your router is *almost* certainly the gateway. What happens if you
ping that address? Do the router LEDS flash? Can you point a browser
there and see anything?
Who set up your router: not you?
> Some sites claim the above ipconfig output indicates my router ip number is
> 10.1.1.1, and yet other sites claim it is 10.1.1.10. Some have even
> suggested my router ip number should be 192.168.15.1. This is all very
> confusing.
Indeed. What about using wireshark to find out what is going on?
Or just type "route"? (On ubuntu, maybe that is sudo route?)
ael
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]