Re: [Ekiga-list] A comparison ALSA-PULSE
- From: Alec Leamas <leamas alec gmail com>
- To: Ekiga mailing list <ekiga-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Ekiga-list] A comparison ALSA-PULSE
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:15:03 +0100
It is at the beginning of the 2 files (the same):
Its setup is:
stream : PLAYBACK
access : RW_INTERLEAVED
format : S16_LE
subformat : STD
channels : 2
rate : 44100
exact rate : 44100 (44100/1)
msbits : 16
buffer_size : 1764
period_size : 441
period_time : 10000
tstamp_mode : NONE
period_step : 1
avail_min : 441
period_event : 0
start_threshold : 1
stop_threshold : 1764
silence_threshold: 0
silence_size : 0
boundary : 1849688064
Actually, I thnk I'm wrong. If the buffer is 1764 frames:. Time for 1
frame = 1/44100 sec = 1000/44100 ms. Time for buffer 1764 * 1000/44100=
40 ms. So, it really not that small, and increasing it is a problem.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]