Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] Request for comment: ANNOUNCE - Ekiga 3.3.0 [UNSTABLE] available

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Eugen Dedu
<Eugen Dedu pu-pm univ-fcomte fr> wrote:
> On 21/12/10 14:39, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Eugen Dedu
>> <Eugen Dedu pu-pm univ-fcomte fr>  wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> What do you think about this announcement?
>>> ===========
>>> This is the first unstable release of the upcoming 3.4 version of Ekiga.
>>>  It
>>> is a major release, bringing several changes (bugs and protocol fixes,
>>> but
>>> not so much features and no security fix) since almost two years ago.  It
>>> is
>>> not a replacement of the last stable release (3.2.7), but should be used
>>> by
>>> people having problems with the stable release (e.g. a pulse plugin
>>> plugin
>>> is included in this release) and by people who want to help ekiga.
>>> While it has not received much testing, it works on developers machines,
>>> and
>>> the only known major regression (which should hopefully be fixed in the
>>> next
>>> unstable release) compared to the last stable release is that presence
>>> does
>>> not work reliably.  Three additional regressions are known:
>>> - the fix "Use NAT ports instead of local ports for RTP, fixing many
>>> connection issues", added in the last stable release, is not included,
>>> - the fix for 16bpp mode, added in the last stable release, is not
>>> included
>>> either
>>> - and on Windows ekiga sometimes crashes on exit.
>>> * What is it ?
>>> ==============
>>> Ekiga is a free Voice over IP softphone allowing you to do free calls
>>> over the Internet.
>>> Ekiga is the first Open Source application to support both H.323 and
>>> SIP, as well as audio and video. Ekiga was formerly known as
>>> GnomeMeeting.
>>> More information can be found at
>>> * Where to get it ?
>>> ===================
>>> Ekiga is available at:
>> It seems it either hasn't been uploaded or there's permission issues
>> on the 3.3 directory as the directory doesn't exist.
> It has not been uploaded since I wait for comments before doing it :o)
> Anyway, it will be done in a few hours.

Ah that would explain that then. Otherwise it all looks fine to me :-)


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]